Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 30 - Sep 4
not persuasive
2) The residual functional capacity finding is not supported by substantial evidence
Weight of VA disability finding
Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Past relevant work – as generally performed
I. A. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2024) - mischaracterization of VE testimony, borderline age, RFC, medical opinion not persuasiveI. A. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 23 20999 RBK (D. N. J. Apr. 26, 2024) (Order by U. S. District Judge Robert B. Kugler) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC required findings RFC lack of support for findings Age categories mechanical application Vocational testimony mischaracterization of record Remand for an award of benefits delay Rulings addressed: Social Security Ruling 96 8p Social Security Ruling 96 9p Social
US$ 69.00
US$ 29.00
US$ 65.00
US$ 19.00
US$ 95.00
US$ 15.00
US$ 35.00
![Compulsory Evacuation Device (Bronze) [DL09-EN019] Rare JMPS-EN008](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0467/0206/7875/products/77731_200w.jpg?v=1598576791)
